Skip to the guide

Puell Multiple backtest

Every Puell Multiple signal since 2011: what the Bitcoin price did next and how close each came to the cycle top or bottom.

Puell Multiple today

1.05

No signal today, 1 Nov 2026

Top signals (4 and above)

4

2 of 4 near a cycle top

Bottom signals (below 0.5)

11

5 of 11 near a cycle bottom

A year after a top signal

+202%

median; a typical day of the same cycles +120%

Signals graded from 16 Jul 2011 to 26 Oct 2026; updated daily from our own Bitcoin node and price data. Last update 2 November 2026, 16:44 UTC

Every signal on the price chart

Top signalBottom signal

BTC daily close (log scale) with a dot on the first day of each signal: warm for the Puell Multiple at 4 or above and cool for the Puell Multiple below 0.5. Signals after 2022 appear with a free account. Open the Puell Multiple chart.

Does the Puell Multiple work?

The Puell Multiple at 4 or above. Selling on it would have missed gains: a year later the price had changed by a median +202%, against +120% for a typical day of the same cycles; 2 of 4 signals were on within 90 days of a cycle top, catching 2 of the 4 tops in its record. With 2 independent signals, chance cannot be ruled out.

The Puell Multiple below 0.5. Mixed: 5 of 11 signals were on within 90 days of a cycle bottom, catching 4 of the 5 bottoms in its record; a year later the price had changed by a median +118%, against +120% for a typical day of the same cycles.

  • The Puell Multiple at 4 or above: 4 signals; 2 of 4 decided were on within 90 days of a cycle top (2 false alarms); it caught 2 of the 4 cycle tops in its record.
  • The Puell Multiple below 0.5: 11 signals; 5 of 11 decided were on within 90 days of a cycle bottom (6 false alarms); it caught 4 of the 5 cycle bottoms in its record.

What followed the signals

The Puell Multiple at 4 or above

BTC price change after the Puell Multiple at 4 or above, against the same change from every day and from the days of the same four-year cycles
AfterSignalsMedian changeMean changeShare upAll days: medianAll days: share upSame cycles: median
7 days4 4 independent+28.7%+39.3%75%+0.8%55%+1.1%
30 days4 4 independent+71.1%+65.9%75%+3.0%57%+4.2%
90 days4 3 independent+36.6%+38.4%75%+10.5%60%+7.4%
365 days4 2 independent+202%+280%75%+87.5%72%+120%

The Puell Multiple below 0.5

BTC price change after the Puell Multiple below 0.5, against the same change from every day and from the days of the same four-year cycles
AfterSignalsMedian changeMean changeShare upAll days: medianAll days: share upSame cycles: median
7 days11 11 independent+4.7%+39.5%64%+0.8%55%+1.1%
30 days11 11 independent+4.8%+36.7%64%+3.0%57%+2.2%
90 days11 9 independent+23.1%+51.9%73%+10.5%60%+12.3%
365 days11 6 independent+118%+373%82%+87.5%72%+120%

Every signal

The Puell Multiple at 4 or above

Every the Puell Multiple at 4 or above signal: the first day of each episode, the reading, the BTC close and the change after it
First dayReadingBTC close7 days30 days90 days365 daysNearest cycle topNear a turn
20 Mar 2013 31 days in signal4.70$64.49+37.9%+83.7%+66.5%+778%259 days before the 2013 top (4 Dec 2013); price −94.8% from itFalse alarm
1 Jun 20134.22$129.30−16.6%−31.9%+6.8%+403%186 days before the 2013 top (4 Dec 2013); price −89.6% from itFalse alarm
11 Nov 2013 53 days in signal4.17$362.98+116%+153%+81.7%+0.7%23 days before the 2013 top (4 Dec 2013); price −70.7% from itHit
27 Nov 2017 25 days in signal4.04$9,733+19.4%+58.4%−1.3%−60.7%19 days before the 2017 top (16 Dec 2017); price −49.7% from itHit
Each cycle top in the indicator's range and whether a signal was on within 90 days of it
Cycle topBTC closeSignal on within 90 days
4 Dec 2013$1,238Yes: the signal from 11 Nov 2013, which began 23 days before it
16 Dec 2017$19,345Yes: the signal from 27 Nov 2017, which began 19 days before it
8 Nov 2021$67,549No signal on within 90 days
6 Oct 2025$124,766 With a free account

The Puell Multiple below 0.5

Every the Puell Multiple below 0.5 signal: the first day of each episode, the reading, the BTC close and the change after it
First dayReadingBTC close7 days30 days90 days365 daysNearest cycle bottomNear a turn
11 Oct 2011 55 days in signal0.42$3.93−38.5%−27.0%+60.9%+208%38 days before the 2011 bottom (18 Nov 2011); price +91.8% from itHit
3 Mar 20120.48$4.61+4.7%+7.8%+14.3%+648%106 days after the 2011 bottom (18 Nov 2011); price +125% from itFalse alarm
15 Apr 20120.46$4.97+4.7%+1.3%+51.8%+1558%149 days after the 2011 bottom (18 Nov 2011); price +142% from itFalse alarm
20 Feb 2014 3 days in signal0.36$111.92+433%+404%+337%+118%328 days before the 2015 bottom (14 Jan 2015); price −32.1% from itFalse alarm
7 Oct 2014 45 days in signal0.46$331.65+19.7%+4.8%−17.1%−26.7%99 days before the 2015 bottom (14 Jan 2015); price +101% from itHit
1 Apr 2015 12 days in signal0.50$246.24−0.7%−5.3%+7.3%+68.8%77 days after the 2015 bottom (14 Jan 2015); price +49.3% from itHit
19 Nov 2018 51 days in signal0.45$4,810−21.3%−22.3%−23.7%+69.1%26 days before the 2018 bottom (15 Dec 2018); price +48.8% from itHit
16 Mar 2020 3 days in signal0.48$5,045+28.9%+31.4%+85.0%+1028%457 days after the 2018 bottom (15 Dec 2018); price +56.1% from itFalse alarm
12 May 2020 21 days in signal0.49$8,821+10.9%+5.1%+34.9%+461%514 days after the 2018 bottom (15 Dec 2018); price +173% from itFalse alarm
27 Jun 20210.48$34,714+1.7%+13.8%+23.1%−40.3%512 days before the 2022 bottom (21 Nov 2022); price +120% from itFalse alarm
13 Jun 2022 74 days in signal0.47$22,472−8.5%−10.0%−2.8%+15.4%161 days before the 2022 bottom (21 Nov 2022); price +42.6% from itHit
Each cycle bottom in the indicator's range and whether a signal was on within 90 days of it
Cycle bottomBTC closeSignal on within 90 days
18 Nov 2011$2.05Yes: the signal from 11 Oct 2011, which began 38 days before it
14 Jan 2015$164.92Yes: the signal from 1 Apr 2015, which began 77 days after it
15 Dec 2018$3,233Yes: the signal from 19 Nov 2018, which began 26 days before it
21 Nov 2022$15,760 With a free account
30 Jun 2026$58,532 With a free account

Method and sources

Signals. Top signal: the Puell Multiple at 4 or above; Bottom signal: the Puell Multiple below 0.5. The levels are the ones commonly quoted for this indicator, fixed before any result was looked at. A signal starts on the first day the condition holds after it has been off for at least 30 days, so a run of days counts once (the same rule as the signal lab).

Point in time. The 365-day average is trailing, so each reading uses only the issuance of that day and the year before it. Daily readings are closed UTC days from 16 July 2011 to 26 October 2026; the open day is never used.

Outcomes. The change of the BTC daily close from the close of the signal's first day to the close 7, 30, 90 and 365 days later, against the same change from every day the indicator has a reading (the base rate). Signals whose windows overlap share the same price moves, so the tables also count independent signals: windows that do not overlap, counted from the first. Recent signals wait for their outcomes.

Cycle tops and bottoms. A cycle top is an all-time-high close followed by a fall of at least 75% before any higher close; the latest all-time high starts the current cycle. A cycle bottom is the lowest close between two tops; the current cycle's bottom is its lowest close so far, so it can still move. A signal is a hit when a turn of its kind came while it was on or within 90 days either side (from 90 days before its first day to 90 days after its last), and a false alarm otherwise; a signal still on, or ended less than 90 days ago, waits. The verdict compares each signal with the median change of every day in the same four-year halving cycle, so the outsized early years neither flatter nor penalise later signals.

Plans. The chart is one of the classics a free account opens: everyone sees today's value and state and the signals up to 31 December 2022; a free account shows the later signals too.

Sources. Our own Bitcoin node and BTC/USD price record, through the published chart linked below. Past signals describe what happened; they are not a forecast and nothing here is investment advice.

Questions

Does the Puell Multiple work?

Selling on it would have missed gains: a year later the price had changed by a median +202%, against +120% for a typical day of the same cycles; 2 of 4 signals were on within 90 days of a cycle top, catching 2 of the 4 tops in its record. With 2 independent signals, chance cannot be ruled out. Mixed: 5 of 11 signals were on within 90 days of a cycle bottom, catching 4 of the 5 bottoms in its record; a year later the price had changed by a median +118%, against +120% for a typical day of the same cycles.

How accurate is the Puell Multiple?

Of the 4 decided signals for the Puell Multiple at 4 or above, 2 were on within 90 days of a cycle top; a year later the price was higher after 75% of them, against 72% of all days. Of the 11 decided signals for the Puell Multiple below 0.5, 5 were on within 90 days of a cycle bottom; a year later the price was higher after 82% of them, against 72% of all days.

Has the Puell Multiple given false signals?

Yes: 8 of its signals were more than 90 days from any cycle turn of their kind. A false alarm here is a signal far from a top or bottom; the price could still move the way the signal suggested, which the outcome table shows.

Is the Puell Multiple signalling now?

No: the Puell Multiple reads 1.05 on 1 November 2026, so neither the Puell Multiple at 4 or above nor the Puell Multiple below 0.5 holds today.

How is this backtest calculated?

Each signal is the first day the Puell Multiple meets its level after at least 30 days without it, using only data that existed that day. We measure the BTC price change 7, 30, 90 and 365 days later against the same change from every day and from the days of the same four-year cycle, and the distance to the nearest cycle top or bottom.

Open the Puell Multiple chartCreate a free accountAll free tools

Signals and outcomes are calculated by CryptoKeyhole from our own Bitcoin node and price data, using only data that existed on each day. Past signals describe what happened; they are not a forecast, and nothing here is investment advice.