Skip to the guide
BTCETHMarket cap (coins we track)BTC dominance (coins we track)

Retail Attention Index

CryptoKeyhole’s Retail Attention Index reads 73 out of 100 (building) on : people read crypto’s Wikipedia articles 1% more over the last week than their 90-day pace.

How fast public curiosity about crypto is changing: Wikipedia readership scored 0 to 100 against its own two years.

0100

73Building

Daily reading for

Attention is building: more people have looked crypto up this week than the last three months would lead you to expect. Views of crypto’s Wikipedia articles over the last 7 days ran 1% above their 90-day pace.

  • Last 7 days12,143 views a day
  • Last 90 days12,038 views a day
  • Momentum1.01× its 90-day pace
  • A week ago84Surging
  • A month ago60Steady
  • A year ago69Building
  • Coinbase, US App Store#48 Finance · outside the top 100 overall

From Wikimedia page-view data (CC0), scored by CryptoKeyhole, daily. Last update 10 November 2026, 02:15 UTC

Two years of attention

  • Very quiet
  • Cooling
  • Steady
  • Building
  • Surging
Each day’s reading against its own trailing two years; the strip colours each run of days by its band.

Ask about this page

Our AI analyst answers questions about this page from CryptoKeyhole’s own data and charts. Free with an account.

Asking opens a free account in a few seconds (a username and a password, no email); then the answer appears here.

Which coins people are looking up

Momentum is the coin’s last 7 days of article views against its last 90; a coin over 1.00× is drawing more readers than usual. Its score places that against its own two years, so a small coin’s spike and Bitcoin’s steady week can be compared. Click a heading to sort.

Coins ranked by the momentum of their Wikipedia readership
CoinMomentumAttention scoreViews a day, last 7Share of attention
Official TrumpTRUMP1.34×8836 a week ago7206.9%
World Liberty FinancialWLFI1.34×7566 a week ago5295.0%
POL (ex-MATIC)POL1.24×9285 a week ago1250.9%
LitecoinLTC1.23×7883 a week ago2553.2%
The GraphGRT1.17×7490 a week ago190.2%
BitcoinBTC1.17×8493 a week ago6,00246.1%
EthereumETH1.07×8088 a week ago1,2188.6%
MoneroXMR0.99×6576 a week ago4183.6%
AvalancheAVAX0.99×6741 a week ago640.6%
DecentralandMANA0.97×6840 a week ago500.5%
DogecoinDOGE0.93×6557 a week ago4924.1%
ToncoinTON0.90×7149 a week ago1101.0%
XRPXRP0.89×5563 a week ago3052.5%
Axie InfinityAXS0.88×4092 a week ago1161.0%
AaveAAVE0.82×3275 a week ago580.4%
BNBBNB0.81×1767 a week ago380.3%
Pyth NetworkPYTH0.81×new30.0%
WorldcoinWLD0.81×4530 a week ago1581.3%
Ethereum ClassicETC0.80×25100 a week ago460.4%
Bitcoin CashBCH0.77×2454 a week ago991.1%
TezosXTZ0.72×129 a week ago220.3%
UniswapUNI0.68×1257 a week ago820.7%
SuiSUI0.68×new30.0%
CardanoADA0.67×1635 a week ago870.9%
Pump.funPUMP0.66×2821 a week ago1561.7%
StellarXLM0.66×1526 a week ago530.6%
PancakeSwapCAKE0.65×2454 a week ago170.1%
PolkadotDOT0.65×68 a week ago490.5%
NeoNEO0.64×45 a week ago110.1%
Shiba InuSHIB0.64×1321 a week ago800.6%
CosmosATOM0.63×new40.0%
FilecoinFIL0.61×20 a week ago310.3%
AlgorandALGO0.60×414 a week ago240.3%
ChilizCHZ0.59×172 a week ago100.1%
SolanaSOL0.58×411 a week ago3303.1%
DashDASH0.57×718 a week ago310.4%
ChainlinkLINK0.57×23 a week ago510.5%
Hedera HashgraphHBAR0.55×35 a week ago200.2%
TRONTRX0.46×45 a week ago2281.5%
NearNEAR0.21×08 a week ago270.4%

Plus adds the score history of the largest coins, the two averages behind the index, and this table as a CSV file.

Compare plans

How the index is built

Each day we take the views of the Wikipedia article of every coin CryptoKeyhole counts, in the ten editions with the most readers, with crawlers and automated agents excluded. We add the coins whose article has the whole last 90 days, so a coin joining never makes a jump.

Momentum is the average views of the last 7 days over the average of the last 90. The index is that momentum’s percentile among the last 730 days’ readings (at least 365): the share of those days whose momentum was at or below today’s, times 100. Each coin’s score is the same calculation on its own article.

A day appears once Wikimedia has published it for every coin, about a day after it ends, so a reading never moves afterwards.

Coverage and limits

  • It reads Wikipedia only for now. Coinbase’s App Store rank is shown beside the index, not in it; it joins as a second component once it has 90 days of its own history to be scored against (hourly collection began on 8 November 2026).
  • It measures change, not size: after a burst of attention the index falls even while readership stays high, because the last 7 days are set against a busy 90.
  • Article views are a proxy for curiosity. They do not show who is reading, or whether they go on to buy; nothing here is about any individual.
  • A coin needs a Wikipedia article about itself: coins without one are not counted.
Bitcoin Retail Attention Index chart, 2016–2026, latest daily value 73.42 (8 Nov 2026)
BitcoinRetail Attention IndexDaily history, 2016–2026; latest daily value 73.42 (8 Nov 2026).Open the interactive chart

Questions

Is retail interest in crypto back?

On the index read 73 out of 100 (building): the last 7 days of crypto’s Wikipedia readership ran 1% above their 90-day pace. A reading above 60 means attention is building; below 40, fading.

What is the Retail Attention Index?

A daily 0 to 100 score of how fast public curiosity about crypto is changing, built from how many people read the Wikipedia articles of the coins we count. It answers whether newcomers are arriving without using any social-media data.

Why Wikipedia?

Reading a coin’s article is what people do when they hear about it for the first time, before they open an account. Wikimedia publishes the counts openly, day by day and back to July 2015, with crawlers separated out.

How often does it update?

Once a day, as soon as Wikimedia has published the day for every coin, usually within a day of it ending. The page rechecks every hour.

Open the chartGet the APIAll free tools

Scores are CryptoKeyhole’s own, computed from Wikimedia’s public page-view data; they measure curiosity, not its reasons.